Factors influencing blood tumor marker concentrations in the absence of neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Tumor markers (TMs) are a heterogeneous group of molecules used in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of cancer patients. During neoplastic differentiation, cells can either directly synthesize or induce the synthesis of TMs, and the release of these molecules into the bloodstream allows their quantification in biological fluids. Although very small concentrations of TMs are usually present in the serum or plasma of healthy subjects, increased concentrations may also be found in the presence of benign diseases or due to technical interference, producing false positive results. MATERIAL AND METHODS AND RESULTS: Our review analyses the causes of false positives described between January 1970 to February 2023 for the TMs most frequently used in clinical practice: α-fetoprotein (AFP), ß2-microglobulin (ß2-M), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), cancer antigen CA 19-9 (CA 19-9), cancer antigen CA 72-4 (CA 72-4), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), chromogranin A (CgA), choriogonadotropin (hCG), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), serum HER2 (sHER2), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II), Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (Pro-GRP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Protein S-100 (S-100) and thyroglobulin (Tg). A total of 247 references were included. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of pathophysiological processes and other conditions that affect the concentration of TMs might improve the interpretation of results and their clinical application.

Variations in tumor growth, intra-individual biological variability, and the interpretation of changes.

OBJECTIVES: The identification of changes in tumor markers (TMs) in cancer patients that indicate response to treatment, stabilization or disease progression is a challenge for laboratory medicine. Several approaches have been proposed: assessing percentage increases, applying discriminant values, and estimating half-life (t1/2) or doubling time (DT). In all of them it is assumed that the TM is a surrogate of the variation in tumor size. In general this variation is time-dependent, but this is not the case of intraindividual biological variability (CVi), which can range from 6 % in CA15-3 to 22 % in CA125. When decisions are made on the basis of DT or t1/2, these values can be affected by the CVi; if it is very large, the growth rate very slow and the period of time between determinations very short, the result obtained for DT may be due mainly to the CVi. The aim of this study is to establish the relationship between the CVi and temporal variables. METHODS: We related equations for calculating DT and t1/2 to the reference change values in tumor markers. RESULTS: The application of the formula obtained allows the calculation of the optimal time between measurements to ensure that the influence of the CVi is minimal in different types of tumors and different scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Intraindividual variation affects the calculation of DT and t1/2. It is necessary to establish the minimum time between two measurements to ensure that the CVi does not affect their calculation or lead to misinterpretation.

Utility of human epididymis protein 4 in the differential diagnosis of ascites.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) may be a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of malignant ascites. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of HE4 for detecting malignant ascites, taking into account the possible false positives identified with adenosine deaminase (ADA), C-reactive protein (CRP), % polynuclear cells (%PMN) and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). METHODS: Concentrations of HE4, ADA, %PMN and CRP were determined in 114 samples of peritoneal fluid and creatinine in serum in order to calculate eGFR. RESULTS: Concentrations of HE4 presented significant differences (P = 0.028) in benign [median (interquartile range)] [582(372)] pmol/L) and malignant ascites ([8241(367)] pmol/L. Sensitivity was 21.2% and specificity 100%. Significant differences were also observed for HE4 between tumors of gynecological origin ([3165(8769)] pmol/L) and others ([665(663)] pmol/L), with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 100%. Classifying according to possible false positives (ADA > 45U/L, CRP > 50 mg/L, %PMN > 90 and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) at maximum specificity, a sensitivity of 33.3% was obtained for HE4, with a cut-off point of 2660 pmol/L. Without possible false positives (ADA < 45U/L, CRP < 50 mg/L, %PMN < 90 and eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), a sensitivity of 37.7% was obtained at 100% specificity for a cut-off point of 1041 pmol/L. Applying these criteria to the entire group, a sensitivity of 36.4% was obtained at maximum specificity. CONCLUSIONS: HE4 allows the identification of malignant ascites with moderate sensitivity at maximum specificity. HE4 levels can differentiate between tumors of gynecological origin and others. Classification according to possible false positives increases sensitivity without losing specificity.

Lung cancer tumor markers in serous effusions and other body fluids.

From its onset and during its progression, lung cancer may affect various extrapulmonary structures. These include the serous membranes, the pleura and pericardium, and less frequently the central nervous system, with leptomeningeal involvement. In these cases, fluid accumulates in the serous membranes which may contain substances secreted by the tumor. Measuring the concentrations of these substances can provide useful information for elucidating the origin of the fluid accumulation, either in pleural and pericardial effusions or in cerebrospinal fluid. This paper describes the histological types of lung cancer that most frequently affect the serosa and leptomeninges. It also reviews the literature on tumor markers in different fluids and makes recommendations for their interpretation.

Tumour Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Patients With Isolated Involuntary Weight Loss.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Paraneoplastic syndrome symptoms include isolated involuntary weight loss (IIWL). The differential diagnosis of cancer from other diseases may require a significant number of tests. Tumour markers (TMs) can be used for the diagnosis and stratification of patients according to cancer risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 606 patients (48% females) seen at the rapid diagnostic unit for IIWL. We determined the levels of TMs carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, soluble fragments of cytokeratin 19, carbohydrate antigen 15-3, carbohydrate antigen 125, neuron specific enolase, alpha-fetoprotein, prostatic specific antigen using the multiparametric analyser COBAS 601. Two cut-off points were established, the upper reference limit described by the manufacturer and a high cut-off point suggested by Molina et al., to stratify patients according to cancer risk. RESULTS: Patients were classified according to TM levels as follows: I) all TMs below the upper reference limit; II) highest number of TMs between the two cut-offs; III) at least one TM above the higher cut-off. The odds ratio for malignancy was 4.3 for group II and 248 for group III. These results indicate that when at least one TM is above the higher cut-off, neoplasia is highly probable. CONCLUSION: TM determination allowed to establish cancer risk in patients with IIWL.

Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection Increases B.1.1.7 Cross-Neutralization by Vaccinated Individuals.

With the spread of new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is a need to assess the protection conferred by both previous infections and current vaccination. Here we tested the neutralizing activity of infected and/or vaccinated individuals against pseudoviruses expressing the spike of the original SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH1), the D614G mutant and the B.1.1.7 variant. Our data show that parameters of natural infection (time from infection and nature of the infecting variant) determined cross-neutralization. Uninfected vaccinees showed a small reduction in neutralization against the B.1.1.7 variant compared to both the WH1 strain and the D614G mutant. Interestingly, upon vaccination, previously infected individuals developed more robust neutralizing responses against B.1.1.7, suggesting that vaccines can boost the neutralization breadth conferred by natural infection.

Comparative Assessment of Two Strategies for Interpreting Tumor Markers in Ascitic Effusions.

BACKGROUND/AIM: There are two strategies for the interpretation of tumor markers (TM) in fluid effusions: i) high cut-off and ii) fluid/serum ratio (F/S) and low cut-off. The objective of this study is to compare these two strategies and to determine whether diagnostic accuracy improves by the identification of possible false positives using Adenosine deaminase (ADA), C reactive protein (CRP) and % of polymorphonuclear cells (%PN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 157 ascitic fluids, 74 of which were malignant. ADA, CRP and %PN were determined in ascitic fluid, and Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), Cancer antigen CA19-9 and Cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) in both fluid and serum. RESULTS: The strategy of high cut-off showed 59.5% sensitivity at 100% specificity. The F/S strategy showed 75.7% sensitivity at 95.2% specificity. Subclassifying cases with ADA, CRP and %PN negative showed 67.5% sensitivity at 100% specificity for high cut-off and for the F/S strategy was 81.7% sensitivity at 98.7% specificity. CONCLUSION: The strategy of F/S with negative ADA, CRP and %PN allow the best interpretation for TM in the ascitic fluid.

Diagnostic Accuracy of CYFRA21-1 in the Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Approximately 20% of pleural effusions are associated with cancer; about 50% require invasive procedures to perform diagnosis. Determination of the concentration of soluble cytokeratin 19-fragments (CYFRA21-1) may help identify patients with malignant effusions. However, pathologies other than cancer can increase its concentration. The identification of these possible false positives with routine tests CRP, ADA, % polymorphonuclear cells (PN) may improve diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CYFRA21-1 in the detection of malignant pleural effusions and the possible false positives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of CYFRA21-1, adenosine deaminase (ADA), C-reactive protein (CRP), and the percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PN%) in the fluid from 643 consecutive undiagnosed pleural effusions was performed. RESULTS: CYFRA21-1 showed 38.7% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity at 175 ng/ml cut-off. Effusions not suspicious of a false-positive showed 39.0% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity, while effusions suspicious of false positive showed lower sensitivity (36.4%) and specificity (95.0%). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of CYFRA21-1 in pleural effusions can be improved by classification according to the possibility of false positives.